Lennon, J. (2019). Learning the Language of Academic Writing: Using the C3WP as a Scaffold in the Secondary English Classroom. Language Arts Journal of Michigan, 34(2). https://doi.org/10.9707/2168-149X.2211
Lewis, C., Perry, R., & Murata, A. (2006). How Should Research Contribute to Instructional Improvement? The Case of Lesson Study. Educational Researcher, 35(3), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X035003003
McDonald, M., Kazemi, E., & Kavanagh, S. S. (2013). Core Practices and Pedagogies of Teacher Education: A Call for a Common Language and Collective Activity. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(5), 378–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487113493807
Moman, J., & Maher, S. (2019). Argument Writing Advanced Institute: Teaching Teachers to Utilize C3WP Units. Language Arts Journal of Michigan, 34(2). https://doi.org/10.9707/2168-149X.2208
National Research Council. (1999). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School: Expanded Edition. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/9853
National Research Council. (2011). A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13165
Penuel, W., Van Horne, K., Severance, S., Quigley, D., & Sumner, T. (2016, July). Students’ Responses to Curricular Activities as Indicator of Coherence in Project-Based Science. ICLS 2016 Proceedings. ICLS 2016, Singapore. https://repository.isls.org//handle/1/327
Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining Key Concepts in Research on Teachers’ Use of Mathematics Curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211–246. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075002211
Russell, J. L., Correnti, R., Stein, M. K., Thomas, A., Bill, V., & Speranzo, L. (2020). Mathematics Coaching for Conceptual Understanding: Promising Evidence Regarding the Tennessee Math Coaching Model. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 42(3), 439–466. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373720940699
Schmidt, R. A. (2013). Unpacking Tracking: The Role of Instruction, Teacher Beliefs and Supplemental Courses in the Relationship Between Tracking and Student Achievement [Ph.D., Vanderbilt University]. https://ir.vanderbilt.edu/handle/1803/10767
Anderson, E., & Young, M. D. (2018). If They Knew Then What We Know Now, Why Haven’t Things Changed? An Examination of District Effectiveness Research. Frontiers in Education, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2018.00087
Bernardinelli, D., Rutt, S., Greany, T., & Higham, R. (2018). Multi-Academy Trusts: Do They Make a Difference to Pupil Outcomes? In UCL IOE Press: London, UK. [Report]. UCL IOE Press.
Duff, M., Flack, C., Lyle, A., Massell, D., & Wohlstetter, P. (2019). Managing Networks for School Improvement: Seven Lessons from the Field (CPRE Workbooks). https://repository.upenn.edu/cpre_workbooks/1
Glazer, J. L., & Egan, C. (2018). The Ties That Bind: Building Civic Capacity for the Tennessee Achievement School District. American Educational Research Journal, 55(5), 928–964. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831218763088
Glazer, J., Massell, D., Lenhoff, S. W., Larbi-Cherif, A., Egan, C., Taylor, J., Ison, A., Deleveaux, J., & Millington, Z. (2020). District-led School Turnaround: Aiming for Ambitious and Equitable Instruction in Shelby County’s iZone (CPRE Research Reports). https://repository.upenn.edu/cpre_researchreports/114
Glazer, J. L., Massell, D., & Malone, M. (2019). Charter Schools in Turnaround: Competing Institutional Logics in the Tennessee Achievement School District. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 41(1), 5–33. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373718795051
Greany, T. (2022). Place-Based Governance and Leadership in Decentralised School Systems: Evidence from England. Journal of Education Policy, 37(2), 247–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2020.1792554
Leithwood, K., & Mccullough, C. (2017). Strong Districts and Their Leadership Project: Executive Summary of Research. Council of Ontario Directors of Education.
Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2015). The Institutional Logics Perspective. In Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences (pp. 1–22). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0187
Wohlstetter, P., Buck, B., Houston, D. M., & Smith, C. O. (2016). Common Core, Uncommon Theory of Action: CEOs in New York City Schools. In A. J. Daly & K. S. Finnigan (Eds.), Thinking and Acting Systemically: Improving School Districts Under Pressure (pp. 147–182). American Educational Research Association. https://doi.org/10.3102/978-0-935302-46-2_6
Wohlstetter, P., Datnow, A., & Park, V. (2008). Creating a System for Data-Driven Decision-Making: Applying the Principal-Agent Framework. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 19(3), 239–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243450802246376
Wohlstetter, P., Houston, D. M., & Buck, B. (2015). Networks in New York City: Implementing the Common Core. Educational Policy, 29(1), 85–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904814556753
Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185–203. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2002.6587995
Zimmer, R., Henry, G. T., & Kho, A. (2017). The Effects of School Turnaround in Tennessee’s Achievement School District and Innovation Zones. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39(4), 670–696. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373717705729
Baxley, G., Sealey-Ruiz, Y., Rogers, C. R., Campano, G., Thomas, E. E., & Stornaiuolo, A. (2021). “You Can Still Fight”: The Black Radical Tradition, Healing, and Literacies. Research in the Teaching of English, 55(3), 213–215.
Cahill, C. (2007). Repositioning Ethical Commitments: Participatory Action Research as a Relational Praxis of Social Change. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 6(3), Article 3.
Campano, G., Ghiso, M. P., Yee, M., & Pantoja, A. (2013). Toward Community Research and Coalitional Literacy Practices for Educational Justice. Language Arts, 90(5), 314–326.
Campano, G., Ngo, L., Low, D. E., & Bartow Jacobs, K. (2016). Young Children Demystifying and Remaking the University Through Critical Play. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 16(2), 199–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798415577875
de los Ríos, C. V., & Molina, A. (2020). Literacies of Refuge: “Pidiendo Posada” as Ritual of Justice. Journal of Literacy Research, 52(1), 32–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X19897840
Gutiérrez, K. D., Morales, P. Z., & Martinez, D. C. (2009). Re-mediating Literacy: Culture, Difference, and Learning for Students From Nondominant Communities. Review of Research in Education, 33(1), 212–245. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X08328267
Huguley, J. P., Delale-O’Connor, L., Wang, M.-T., & Parr, A. K. (2021). African American Parents’ Educational Involvement in Urban Schools: Contextualized Strategies for Student Success in Adolescence. Educational Researcher, 50(1), 6–16. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20943199
Lather, P. (1986). Issues of Validity in Openly Ideological Research: Between a Rock and a Soft Place. Interchange, 17(4), 63–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01807017
Low, D. E. (2017). Not to be “Destoried”: How an Academically Marginalized Student Employs Comics and Multimodal Authorship to Claim a Counter-Identity | Ubiquity. Ubiquity: The Journal of Literature, Literacy, and the Arts, 4, 6–56.
Lytle, S. (2008). At Last: Practitioner Inquiry and the Practice of Teaching: Some Thoughts on Better. Research on the Teaching of English, 42(3), 373–379.
Rusoja, A. (2017). We Are Our Own Best Advocates: Latinx Immigrants Teaching And Learning For Their Rights [Ph.D., University of Pennsylvania]. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2559
Thakurta, A., Kannan, C., Setiawan, D., Kosasih, M., Ghiso, M. P., & Campano, G. (2020). On the Power of the Collective in Community-based Educational Research. Penn GSE Perspectives on Urban Education, 17(1).
Vasudevan, L., & Campano, G. (2009). The Social Production of Adolescent Risk and the Promise of Adolescent Literacies. Review of Research in Education, 33(1), 310–353. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X08330003
Willis, A. I. (2015). Literacy and Race: Access, Equity, and Freedom. Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice, 64(1), 23–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/2381336915617617
