59 item sets

• 

  OB Citations - Cross-Sector Research on Learning and Improvement
• 

  OB Citations - Design Thinking and the Learning Sciences
• 

  OB Citations - Equity and Improvement: Engaging Communities in Educational Research
• 

  OB Citations - Measurement for Improvement in Education
• 

  Ob Citations - Research–Practice Partnerships in Education Within the United States
• 

  OB Citations - Scale and Sustainability of Education Innovation and Improvement
• 

  OB Citations: Teacher Collaboration in School Improvement
• 

  OB Citations - Traditions of Quality Improvement in Education
• 

  Handbook Chapter 4 Citations

71 items

• 

  Design as Scholarship: Case Studies from the Learning Sciences

  Svihla, V., & Reeve, R. (Eds.). (2016). Design as Scholarship: Case Studies from the Learning Sciences. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315709550
• 

  The Sciences of the Artificial

  Simon, H. A. (1996). The Sciences of the Artificial (3rd ed.). MIT Press.
• 

  What Is Design Thinking and Why Is It Important?

  Razzouk, R., & Shute, V. (2012). What Is Design Thinking and Why Is It Important? Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 330–348. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312457429
• 

  The Idea of Design

  Margolin, V., & Buchanan, R. (Eds.). (1995). The Idea of Design. MIT Press.
• 

  Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching, and Learning

  Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J. (2005). Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching, and Learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 103–120. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00832.x
• 

  The Core of ‘Design Thinking’ and Its Application

  Dorst, K. (2011). The Core of ‘Design Thinking’ and Its Application. Design Studies, 32(6), 521–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.07.006
• 

  Designerly Ways of Knowing: Design Discipline Versus Design Science

  Cross, N. (2001). Designerly Ways of Knowing: Design Discipline Versus Design Science. Design Issues, 17(3), 49–55. https://doi.org/10.1162/074793601750357196
• 

  Design Research – Its 50-Year Transformation

  Cooper, R. (2019). Design Research – Its 50-Year Transformation. Design Studies, 65, 6–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2019.10.002
• 

  Activity Theory and Educational Technology Design

  Mwanza-Simwami, D. (2013). Activity Theory and Educational Technology Design. In R. Luckin, S. Puntambekar, P. Goodyear, B. L. Grabowski, J. Underwood, & N. Winters (Eds.), Handbook of Design in Educational Technology. Routledge.
• 

  Acting with Technology: Activity Theory and Interaction Design

  Kaptelinin, V., & Nardi, B. A. (2006). Acting with Technology: Activity Theory and Interaction Design. MIT Press.
• 

  Applying an Activity Theory Lens to Designing Instruction for Learning About the Structure, Behavior, and Function of a Honeybee System

  Danish, J. A. (2014). Applying an Activity Theory Lens to Designing Instruction for Learning About the Structure, Behavior, and Function of a Honeybee System. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(2), 100–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2013.856793
• 

  The Materiality of Design in E-Textiles

  Tan, V., Keune, A., & Peppler, K. (2016). The Materiality of Design in E-Textiles. In S. Goldman & Z. Kabayadondo (Eds.), Taking Design Thinking to School. Routledge.
• 

  Some Reflections on Designing Construction Kits for Kids

  Resnick, M., & Silverman, B. (2005). Some Reflections on Designing Construction Kits for Kids. Proceedings of the 2005 Conference on Interaction Design and Children, 117–122. https://doi.org/10.1145/1109540.1109556
• 

  Materials-to-Develop-with: The Making of a Makerspace

  Keune, A., & Peppler, K. (2019). Materials-to-Develop-with: The Making of a Makerspace. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 280–293. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12702
• 

  Constructionism in Practice: Designing, Thinking, and Learning in A Digital World

  Kafai, Y. B., & Resnick, M. (Eds.). (1996). Constructionism in Practice: Designing, Thinking, and Learning in A Digital World. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203053492
• 

  Software Design as a Learning Environment

  Harel, I., & Papert, S. (1990). Software Design as a Learning Environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 1(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1049482900010102
• 

  Children Designers: Interdisciplinary Constructions for Learning and Knowing Mathematics in a Computer-rich School

  Harel, I. (1991). Children Designers: Interdisciplinary Constructions for Learning and Knowing Mathematics in a Computer-rich School. Ablex.
• 

  Transforming Constructivist Learning into Action: Design Thinking in education

  Scheer, A., Noweski, C., & Meinel, C. (2012). Transforming Constructivist Learning into Action: Design Thinking in education. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 17(3). https://ojs.lboro.ac.uk/DATE/article/view/1758
• 

  Constructivism and Instructional Design

  Merrill, M. D. (1991). Constructivism and Instructional Design. Educational Technology, 31(5), 45–53.
• 

  Designing Environments for Constructive Learning

  Duffy, T. M., Lowyck, J., Jonassen, D. H., & Welsh, T. M. (Eds.). (1993). Designing Environments for Constructive Learning. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-78069-1
• 

  Constructivism and the Design of Learning Environments: Context and Authentic Activities for Learning

  Honebein, P. C., Duffy, T. M., & Fishman, B. J. (1993). Constructivism and the Design of Learning Environments: Context and Authentic Activities for Learning. In T. M. Duffy, J. Lowyck, D. H. Jonassen, & T. M. Welsh (Eds.), Designing Environments for Constructive Learning (pp. 87–108). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-78069-1_5