Hinnings, C. R., Logue, D., & Zietsma, C. (2017). Fields, Institutional Infrastructure, and Governance. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, T. B. Lawrence, & R. E. Meyer (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (pp. 170–197). https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446280669.n7
Isaacs, S. L., & Knickman, J. R. (2005). Field Building: Lessons From The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation’s Anthology Series. Health Affairs, 24(4), 1161–1165. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.24.4.1161
James Irvine Foundation. (2009). The Strong Field Framework: A Guide and Toolkit for Funders and Nonprofits Committed to Large-scale Impact. Bridgespan Group. https://irvine-dot-org.s3.amazonaws.com/documents/64/attachments/strongfieldframework.pdf?1412656138
Kraatz, M. S., & Block, E. S. (2017). Institutional Pluralism Revisited. In The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (pp. 532–557). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446280669.n21
Laumann, E. O., Marsden, P. V., & Prensky, D. (1983). The Boundary Specification Problem in Network Analysis. In R. S. Burt & M. J. Minor (Eds.), Applied Network Analysis: A Methodological Introduction (pp. 18–34). SAGE.
Lawrence, T. B., Leca, B., & Zilber, T. B. (2013). Institutional Work: Current Research, New Directions and Overlooked Issues. Organization Studies, 34(8), 1023–1033. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840613495305
Lawrence, T. B., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutions and Institutional Work. In The SAGE Handbook of Organization Studies (2nd ed., pp. 215–254). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608030
Lawrence, T. B., Suddaby, R., & Leca, B. (Eds.). (2009). Institutional Work: Actors and Agency in Institutional Studies of Organizations. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511596605
Maguire, S., Hardy, C., & Lawrence, T. B. (2004). Institutional Entrepreneurship in Emerging Fields: HIV/AIDS Treatment Advocacy in Canada. The Academy of Management Journal, 47(5), 657–679. https://doi.org/10.5465/20159610
Martí, I., & Mair, J. (2009). Bringing Change into the Lives of the Poor: Entrepreneurship Outside Traditional Boundaries. In B. Leca, R. Suddaby, & T. B. Lawrence (Eds.), Institutional Work: Actors and Agency in Institutional Studies of Organizations (pp. 92–119). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511596605.004
Nelson, R. R. (1994). The Co-evolution of Technology, Industrial Structure, and Supporting Institutions. Industrial and Corporate Change, 3(1), 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/3.1.47
Ogawa, R. T., Crowson, R. L., & Goldring, E. B. (1999). Enduring Dilemmas of School Organization. In J. Murphy & K. S. Louis (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Educational Administration (Second, pp. 277–295). Jossey-Bass, Inc.
Penuel, W. R., Briggs, D. C., Davidson, K. L., Herlihy, C., Sherer, D., Hill, H. C., Farrell, C., & Allen, A.-R. (2017). How School and District Leaders Access, Perceive, and Use Research. AERA Open, 3(2), 2332858417705370. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858417705370
Perkmann, M., & Spicer, A. (2008). How Are Management Fashions Institutionalized? The Role of Institutional Work. Human Relations, 61(6), 811–844. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726708092406
Peurach, D. J. (Ed.). (2021). Continuous Improvement in Education. Oxford Bibliographies. Oxford University Press. https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/page/155
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1974). Organizational Decision Making as a Political Process: The Case of a University Budget. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19(2), 135–151. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393885
Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (2008). Institutional Logics. In The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (pp. 99–128). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200387
Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The Institutional Logics Perspective: A New Approach to Culture, Structure and Process. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199601936.001.0001
Episode 1705: Paul Cobb on Improving Teaching at Scale. (2017). [Podcast]. https://www.podomatic.com/podcasts/mathed/episodes/2017-05-08T12_40_38-07_00
Cannata, M., Cohen-Vogel, L., & Sorum, M. (2017). Partnering for Improvement: Improvement Communities and Their Role in Scale Up. Peabody Journal of Education, 92(5), 569–588. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2017.1368633
Redding, C., Cannata, M., & Taylor Haynes, K. (2017). With Scale in Mind: A Continuous Improvement Model for Implementation. Peabody Journal of Education, 92(5), 589–608. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2017.1368635
Rubin, M., Patrick, S. K., & Goldring, E. B. (2017). Dilemmas of Prescriptive Practices and Perceived Alignment in Program Implementation. Peabody Journal of Education, 92(5), 609–626. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2017.1368646
Rutledge, S. A., Brown, S., & Petrova, K. (2017). Scaling Personalization: Exploring the Implementation of an Academic and Social-Emotional Innovation in High Schools. Peabody Journal of Education, 92(5), 627–648. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2017.1368650
Wilcox, K. C., Lawson, H. A., & Angelis, J. I. (2017). COMPASS-AIM: A University/P–12 Partnership Innovation for Continuous Improvement. Peabody Journal of Education, 92(5), 649–674. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2017.1368654
The Strategic Literacy Initiative (SLI) at WestEd is a nationally recognized leader in literacy professional development and research. SLI is best known for developing the Reading Apprenticeship® instructional framework, which is the theoretical foundation for all work conducted by SLI.
Reading Apprenticeship professional development serves educators in middle school, high school, and college with a research-based and research-validated approach that promotes students’ engagement and achievement in subject area literacy.
Multiple randomized, controlled studies found that students exposed to Reading Apprenticeship made significant gains in literacy and disciplinary knowledge, and developed more positive academic identities and dispositions toward reading and learning.
SLI researchers regularly contribute to the field of adolescent literacy with publications in professional books and journals, including the American Educational Research Journal, the Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, and the Handbook of Adolescent Literacy Research.
SLI also publishes directly for teachers, with its updated best-selling books, Reading for Understanding (check out the video below) and Leading for Literacy, and articles in publications such as Phi Delta Kappan, English Journal, and Voices from the Middle.
Reading Apprenticeship is committed to improving learning outcomes for middle school, high school, and college students by assisting them to become powerful, strategic, and independent readers.
We work toward this mission by designing and facilitating professional learning focused on helping all students achieve higher levels of academic literacy. We continuously improve our work through research and development and we make our work accessible through grant-funded activities.
We carry out our mission in the context of convening and providing support for a national network of middle school, high school, and college educators working to embed the Reading Apprenticeship instructional framework in their varied local contexts.
Newman, D., Zacamy, J., Lazarev, V., & Lin, L. (2017). School Processes That Can Drive Scaling-Up of an Innovation or Contribute to Its Abandonment. Peabody Journal of Education, 92(5), 675–701. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2017.1368658
Bang, M., (Chair) & Ishimaru, A. M. (Discussant) (2017). Co-Designing Family and Community Wellness and Educational Justice: Findings From the Family Leadership Design Collaborative. AERA Annual Meeting, San Antonio.
Wilson, C. M., Nickson, D., Wilson-Clark, D., & Hetrick, C. (2017). Advancing Educational Justice Given the Benefits, Challenges, and Potential of Participatory Action Research. AERA Annual Meeting, San Antonio.
Lopez, G. R., & Kuttner, P. (2017). West Side School-Community Design Circle: A Community Leadership Partnership on the West Side of Salt Lake City, Utah. AERA Annual Meeting, San Antonio.
Geller, J., & Alcantara, V. (2017). Designing for Culturally Responsive Family Engagement: The Seeds of a Participatory Action Research Project. AERA Annual Meeting, San Antonio.
Alcantara, V., & Geller, J. (2017). Moving from “This Is How It’s Always Been” to “This Is How It Must Be”: Lessons from Participatory Design Research (p. 23). Family Leadership Design Collaborative.
Dixón-Roman, E. (2020). Racialized Formations of Learning In and Across Contexts – Family Leadership Design Collaborative. Family Leadership Design Collaborative. https://familydesigncollab.org/2020/04/27/racialized-formations-of-learning-in-and-across-contexts/
