Brayboy, B. M. J. (2005). Toward a Tribal Critical Race Theory in Education. The Urban Review, 37(5), 425–446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-005-0018-y
Bell, P. (2004). On the Theoretical Breadth of Design-Based Research in Education. Educational Psychologist, 39(4), 243–253. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3904_6
Baquedano-López, P., Alexander, R. A., & Hernandez, S. J. (2013). Equity Issues in Parental and Community Involvement in Schools: What Teacher Educators Need to Know. Review of Research in Education, 37(1), 149–182. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X12459718
Bang, M., Faber, L., Gurneau, J., Marin, A., & Soto, C. (2016). Community-Based Design Research: Learning Across Generations and Strategic Transformations of Institutional Relations Toward Axiological Innovations. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 23(1), 28–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2015.1087572
Bang, M. (2020). Learning on the Move Toward Just, Sustainable, and Culturally Thriving Futures. Cognition and Instruction, 38(3), 434–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2020.1777999
Archibald, J.-A. (2008). Indigenous Storywork: Educating the Heart, Mind, Body, and Spirit. University of British Columbia Press. https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/distributed/I/bo70082269.html
Okuno, E., Chen, J. C., & Huang, M. (2020). Circling To Move Ahead: Building Asian American Community Power For Educational Justice. https://familydesigncollab.org/2020/04/25/circling-to-move-ahead-building-asian-american-community-power-for-educational-justice/
Tavares, H. (2020). Re-Imagining and Humanizing Parent-Teacher Conversations and Interactions through Role-Play. Family Leadership Design Collaborative. https://familydesigncollab.org/2020/07/17/roleplay/
Tuck, E. (2009). Suspending Damage: A Letter to Communities. Harvard Educational Review, 79(3), 409–427. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.79.3.n0016675661t3n15
Valdes, G. (1996). Con Respeto: Bridging the Distances Between Culturally Diverse Families and Schools: An Ethnographic Portrait. Teachers College Press.
Warren, M. R., Hong, S., Rubin, C. L., & Sychitkokhong, P. U. (2009). Beyond the Bake Sale: A Community-Based Relational Approach to Parent Engagement in Schools. Teachers College Record, 111(9), 2209–2254. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810911100901
Warren, M. R., Park, S. O., & Tieken, M. C. (2016). The Formation of Community-Engaged Scholars: A Collaborative Approach to Doctoral Training in Education Research. Harvard Educational Review, 86(2), 233–260. https://doi.org/10.17763/0017-8055.86.2.233
Wilson, C. M. (2015). Refusing Detroit’s Public School Failure: African American Women’s Educational Advocacy and Critical Care Versus the Politics of Disposability. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 23, 125–125. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v23.1777
Leavitt, D. (2010). Inquiry As Stance: Practitioner Research for the Next Generation [Book review]. i.e.: inquiry in education, 1(2). https://digitalcommons.nl.edu/ie/vol1/iss2/7
Allensworth, E. (2013). The Use of Ninth-Grade Early Warning Indicators to Improve Chicago Schools. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR), 18(1), 68–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/10824669.2013.745181
Austin, K., & Bolte, J. (2019). Improvement on the Front Lines: Using Learning Huddles to Shift Instruction. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/regions/west/Publications/Details/270
Bennett, B., & Provost, L. (2015). What’s Your Theory? Driver Diagram Serves as Tool for Building and Testing Theories for Improvement. Quality Progress, 48(7), 36–43.
Bowker, G. C., Baker, K., Millerand, F., & Ribes, D. (2010). Toward Information Infrastructure Studies: Ways of Knowing in a Networked Environment. In J. Hunsinger, L. Klastrup, & M. Allen (Eds.), International Handbook of Internet Research (pp. 97–117). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9789-8_5
Coburn, C. E., Honig, M. I., & Stein, M. K. (2009). What’s the Evidence on Districts’ Use of Evidence? In J. D. Bransford, D. J. Stipek, N. J. Vye, L. M. Gomez, & D. Lam (Eds.), The Role of Research in Educational Improvement (pp. 67–86). Harvard Education Press.
Coburn, C. E., & Turner, E. O. (2011). Research on Data Use: A Framework and Analysis. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 9(4), 173–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/15366367.2011.626729
Haertel, E. (2013). Expanding Views of Interpretation/Use Arguments. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 11(1–2), 68–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/15366367.2013.790729
Hough, H. J., Willis, J., Grunow, A., Krausen, K., Kwon, S., Mulfinger, L. S., & Park, S. (2017). Continuous Improvement in Practice (Policy Analysis for California Education). https://edpolicyinca.org/publications/continuous-improvement-practice
Ing, M., Chinen, S., Jackson, K., & Smith, T. M. (2021). When Should I Use a Measure to Support Instructional Improvement at Scale? The Importance of Considering Both Intended and Actual Use in Validity Arguments. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 40(1), 92–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12393
Jackson, K., Nieman, H. J., & Kochmanski, N. (2019). Making Sense of Teachers’ Varied Responses to Representations of Practice. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Research Conference.
Kosovich, J. J., Hulleman, C. S., & Barron, K. E. (2019). Measuring Motivation in Educational Settings: A Case for Pragmatic Measurement. In K. A. Renninger & S. E. Hidi (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Motivation and Learning (pp. 713–738). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316823279.030
Krumm, A., Penuel, W. R., Pazera, C., & Landel, C. (2020). Measuring Equitable Science Instruction at Scale. The Interdisciplinarity of the Learning Sciences, 4, 2461–2468. https://repository.isls.org//handle/1/6607
Moss, P. A. (2016). Shifting the Focus of Validity for Test Use. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 23(2), 236–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2015.1072085
Murnane, R. J., Sharkey, N. S., & Boudett, K. P. (2005). Using Student-Assessment Results to Improve Instruction: Lessons From a Workshop. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR), 10(3), 269–280. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327671espr1003_3
Leinwand, S., Brahier, D., & Huinker, D. (2014). Principles to Actions: Ensuring Mathematical Success for All. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Penuel, W. R., Van Horne, K., Jacobs, J. J., & Turner, M. (2018). Developing a Validity Argument for Practical Measures of Student Experience in Project-Based Science Classrooms. American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting.
Penuel, W. R., & Watkins, D. A. (2019). Assessment to Promote Equity and Epistemic Justice: A Use-Case of a Research-Practice Partnership in Science Education. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 683(1), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716219843249
Solberg, L. I., Mosser, G., & McDonald, S. (1997). The Three Faces of Performance Measurement: Improvement, Accountability, and Research. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement, 23(3), 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1070-3241(16)30305-4
Spillane, J. P., & Miele, D. B. (2007). Evidence in Practice: A Framing of the Terrain. Teachers College Record, 109(13), 46–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810710901303
Farrell, C., Davidson, K. L., Repko-Erwin, M., Penuel, W. R., Quantz, M., Wong, H., Riedy, R., & Brink, Z. (2018). A Descriptive Study of the IES Researcher–Practitioner Partnerships in Education Research Program (Technical Report No. 3). National Center for Research in Policy and Practice.
Bakah, M. B. A., Nihuka, K. A., & Anto, A. G. (2019). Fostering the Sustainability of Curriculum Innovations Through Curriculum Design. In J. Pieters, J. Voogt, & N. Pareja Roblin (Eds.), Collaborative Curriculum Design for Sustainable Innovation and Teacher Learning. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20062-6
Star, S. L., & Ruhleder, K. (1994). Steps towards an ecology of infrastructure: Complex problems in design and access for large-scale collaborative systems. Proceedings of the 1994 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 253–264. https://doi.org/10.1145/192844.193021