Radinsky, J., Milz, D., Zellner, M., Pudlock, K., Witek, C., Hoch, C., & Lyons, L. (2017). How Planners and Stakeholders Learn With Visualization Tools: Using Learning Sciences Methods to Examine Planning Processes. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 60(7), 1296–1323. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2016.1221795
Rigby, J. G. (2014). Three Logics of Instructional Leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 50(4), 610–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X13509379
Russell, J. L. (2011). From Child’s Garden to Academic Press: The Role of Shifting Institutional Logics in Redefining Kindergarten Education. American Educational Research Journal, 48(2), 236–267. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831210372135
Scott, W. R., Ruef, M., Mendel, P. J., & Caronna, C. A. (2000). Institutional Change and Healthcare Organizations: From Professional Dominance to Managed Care. University of Chicago Press. https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/I/bo3631315.html
Spillane, J. P., Hopkins, M., & Sweet, T. M. (2015). Intra- and Interschool Interactions about Instruction: Exploring the Conditions for Social Capital Development. American Journal of Education, 122(1), 71–110. https://doi.org/10.1086/683292
Spillane, J. P., Reiser, B. J., & Gomez, L. M. (2006). Policy Implementation and Cognition: The Role Human, Social, and Distributed Cognition in Framing Policy Implementation. In M. I. Honig (Ed.), New Directions in Education Policy Implementation (pp. 47–64). State University of New York Press.
Spillane, J. P., Reiser, B. J., & Reimer, T. (2002). Policy Implementation and Cognition: Reframing and Refocusing Implementation Research. Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 387–431. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543072003387
Varelas, M., Settlage, J., & Mensah, F. M. (2015). Explorations of the Structure–Agency Dialectic as a Tool for Framing Equity in Science Education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(4), 439–447. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21230
Watson, S. L., & Watson, W. R. (2011). Critical, Emancipatory, and Pluralistic Research for Education: A Review of Critical Systems Theory. Journal of Thought, 46(3–4), 63. https://www.jstor.org/10.2307/jthought.46.3-4.63
Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the Process of Sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409–421. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0133
Wilensky, U., & Resnick, M. (1999). Thinking in Levels: A Dynamic Systems Approach to Making Sense of the World. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 8(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009421303064
Woulfin, S. L. (2015). Catalysts of Change: An Examination of Coaches’ Leadership Practices in Framing a Reading Reform (2015). Journal of School Leadership, 25(3), 526–557. https://doi.org/10.1177/105268461502500309
Woulfin, S. L. (2016). Duet or Duel? A Portrait of Two Logics of Reading Instruction in an Urban School District. American Journal of Education, 122(3), 337–365. https://doi.org/10.1086/685848
Woulfin, S. L., Donaldson, M. L., & Gonzales, R. (2016). District Leaders’ Framing of Educator Evaluation Policy. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52(1), 110–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X15616661
Woulfin, S., & Gabriel, R. E. (2020). Interconnected Infrastructure for Improving Reading Instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(S1), S109–S117. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.339
Woulfin, S. L., & Jones, B. (2017). Rooted in Relationships: An Analysis of Dimensions of Social Capital Enabling Instructional Coaching. Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 3(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPCC-07-2017-0017
Barber, B. R. (2004). Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Twentieth-anniversary edition, with a new preface. University of California Press.
Bryk, A. S. (2017, April 21). Redressing Inequities: An Aspiration in Search of a Method [Keynote address]. Fourth Annual Carnegie Foundation Summit on Improvement in Education, San Francisco, CA. https://www.carnegiefoundation.org/resources/publications/redressing-inequities-an-aspiration-in-search-of-a-method/
Cochran-Smith, M., Baker, M., Burton, S., Chang, W.-C., Cummings Carney, M., Fernández, M. B., Stringer Keefe, E., Miller, A. F., & Sánchez, J. G. (2017). The Accountability Era in Us Teacher Education: Looking Back, Looking Forward. European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(5), 572–588. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2017.1385061
Community College Research Center. (n.d.). Community College FAQs. Community College Research Center. Retrieved October 4, 2022, from https://ccrc.tc.columbia.edu/community-college-faqs.html
Farrow, F., & Morrison, S. A. (2019). Placing Equity Concerns at the Center of Knowledge Development. Center for the Study of Social Policy. https://cssp.org/resource/equity-at-the-center/
Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Making Organization Research Matter: Power, Values and Phronesis. In S. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. Lawrence, & W. Nord (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Organization Studies (2nd ed., pp. 370–387). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608030.n11
Gildersleeve, R. E. (2009). Organizing Learning for Transformation in College Outreach Programmes. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 4(1), 77–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/15544800802557177
Gomez, K., Gomez, L. M., Rodela, K. C., Horton, E. S., Cunningham, J., & Ambrocio, R. (2015). Embedding Language Support in Developmental Mathematics Lessons: Exploring the Value of Design as Professional Development for Community College Mathematics Instructors. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(5), 450–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487115602127
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1988). Do Inquiry Paradigms Imply Inquiry Methodologies? In D. M. Fetterman (Ed.), Qualitative Approaches to Evaluation in Education: The Silent Scientific Revolution. Praeger.
Malin, J., & Brown, C. (Eds.). (2019). The Role of Knowledge Brokers in Education: Connecting the Dots Between Research and Practice. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429462436
Merseth, K. K. (2011). Update: Report on Innovations in Developmental Mathematics—Moving Mathematical Graveyards. Journal of Developmental Education, 34(3), 32–38.
Norman, J. (2017). Pathways Post-Participation Outcomes: Preliminary Findings (Carnegie Math Pathways Research Brief, p. 14) [Research Brief]. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
Nuñez, A.-M. (2009b). Creating Pathways to College for Migrant Students: Assessing a Migrant Outreach Program. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR), 14(3), 226–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/10824660903375636
Nuñez, A.-M. (2009). Migrant Students’ College Access: Emerging Evidence From the Migrant Student Leadership Institute. Journal of Latinos and Education, 8(3), 181–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348430902888781
Núñez, A.-M. (2017). What Can Latina/o Migrant Students Tell Us about College Outreach and Access? In P. A. Pérez & M. E. Zarate (Eds.), Facilitating Educational Success for Migrant Farmworker Students in the U.S. (pp. 82–93). Routledge.
Sandoval, C., & Van Es, E. A. (2021). Examining the Practices of Generating an Aim Statement in a Teacher Preparation Networked Improvement Community. Teachers College Record, 123(6), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146812112300606
