Heenan, B., Houghton, N., Ramage, K., St. John, M., & Stokes, L. (2017). Deep Changes in Classroom Practice: Teachers’ Perspectives on the Effects of Participation in the C3WP. Inverness Research.
Kane, B., Cobb, P., & Gibbons, L. (2018). Understanding Content-Specific Instructional Coaching: On-the-Ground Support for Teacher Development. In P. Cobb, K. Jackson, E. Henrick, & T. M. Smith, Systems for Instructional Improvement: Creating Coherence from the Classroom to the District Office (pp. 113–134). Harvard Education Press.
Kazemi, E., Gibbons, L., Lewis, R., Fox, A., Hintz, A., Kelley-Petersen, M., Cunard, A., Lomax, K., Lenges, A., & Balf, R. (2018). Math Labs: Teachers, Teacher Educators, and School Leaders Learning Together With and From Their Own Students. NCSM Journal of Mathematics Education Leadership, 19(1), 14.
Kazemi, E., & Hubbard, A. (2008). New Directions for the Design and Study of Professional Development: Attending to the Coevolution of Teachers’ Participation Across Contexts. Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 428–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324330
Kazemi, E., & Resnick, A. F. (2019). Organising Schools for Teacher and Leader Learning. In G. M. Lloyd, O. Chapman, G. M. Lloyd, O. Chapman, G. M. Lloyd, O. Chapman, G. M. Lloyd, O. Chapman, G. M. Lloyd, O. Chapman, G. M. Lloyd, O. Chapman, G. M. Lloyd, & O. Chapman (Eds.), International Handbook of Mathematics Teacher Education: Volume 3: Participants in Mathematics Teacher Education (Second Edition). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004419230_016
Kochmanski, N. (2020). Aspects of High-Quality Mathematics Coaching: What Coaches Need to Know and Be Able to Do to Support Individual Teachers’ Learning [Thesis]. https://ir.vanderbilt.edu/handle/1803/16114
Lampert, M., Beasley, H., Ghousseini, H., Kazemi, E., & Franke, M. (2010). Using Designed Instructional Activities to Enable Novices to Manage Ambitious Mathematics Teaching. In M. K. Stein & L. Kucan (Eds.), Instructional Explanations in the Disciplines (pp. 129–141). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0594-9_9
Lennon, J. (2019). Learning the Language of Academic Writing: Using the C3WP as a Scaffold in the Secondary English Classroom. Language Arts Journal of Michigan, 34(2). https://doi.org/10.9707/2168-149X.2211
Lewis, C., Perry, R., & Murata, A. (2006). How Should Research Contribute to Instructional Improvement? The Case of Lesson Study. Educational Researcher, 35(3), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X035003003
McDonald, M., Kazemi, E., & Kavanagh, S. S. (2013). Core Practices and Pedagogies of Teacher Education: A Call for a Common Language and Collective Activity. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(5), 378–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487113493807
Moman, J., & Maher, S. (2019). Argument Writing Advanced Institute: Teaching Teachers to Utilize C3WP Units. Language Arts Journal of Michigan, 34(2). https://doi.org/10.9707/2168-149X.2208
Munter, C., & Correnti, R. (2017). Examining Relations between Mathematics Teachers’ Instructional Vision and Knowledge and Change in Practice. American Journal of Education, 123(2), 171–202. https://doi.org/10.1086/689928
Munter, C., Wilhelm, A. G., Cobb, P., & Cordray, D. S. (2014). Assessing Fidelity of Implementation of an Unprescribed, Diagnostic Mathematics Intervention. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 7(1), 83–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2013.809177
National Research Council. (1999). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School: Expanded Edition. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/9853
National Research Council. (2011). A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13165
Neumerski, C. M. (2013). Rethinking Instructional Leadership, a Review: What Do We Know About Principal, Teacher, and Coach Instructional Leadership, and Where Should We Go From Here? Educational Administration Quarterly, 49(2), 310–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X12456700
Penuel, W., Van Horne, K., Severance, S., Quigley, D., & Sumner, T. (2016, July). Students’ Responses to Curricular Activities as Indicator of Coherence in Project-Based Science. ICLS 2016 Proceedings. ICLS 2016, Singapore. https://repository.isls.org//handle/1/327
Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining Key Concepts in Research on Teachers’ Use of Mathematics Curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211–246. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075002211
Russell, J. L., Correnti, R., Stein, M. K., Thomas, A., Bill, V., & Speranzo, L. (2020). Mathematics Coaching for Conceptual Understanding: Promising Evidence Regarding the Tennessee Math Coaching Model. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 42(3), 439–466. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373720940699
Schmidt, R. A. (2013). Unpacking Tracking: The Role of Instruction, Teacher Beliefs and Supplemental Courses in the Relationship Between Tracking and Student Achievement [Ph.D., Vanderbilt University]. https://ir.vanderbilt.edu/handle/1803/10767
Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (2009). The Teaching Gap: Best Ideas from the World’s Teachers for Improving Education in the Classroom. Simon and Schuster.
Sztajn, P., Borko, H., & Smith, T. M. (2017). Research on Mathematics Professional Development. In J. Cai (Ed.), Compendium for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 793–823). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Horn, I. S., Kane, B., & Garner, B. (2018). Teacher Collaborative Time: Helping Teachers Make Sense of Ambitious Teaching in the Context of Their Schools. In P. Cobb, K. Jackson, E. Henrick, & T. M. Smith, Systems for Instructional Improvement: Creating Coherence from the Classroom to the District Office (pp. 93–112). Harvard Education Press.
Jackson, K. J., Cobb, P., Ing, M., Ahn, J., Smith, T. M., & Kochmanski, N. M. (in press). Developing and Using Practical Measures to Inform Instructional Improvement in Mathematics at Scale. In P. G. LeMahieu & P. Cobb (Eds.), Practical Measurement for Improvement. Harvard Education Press.
Friedrich, I., Bear, R., & Eidman-Aadahl, E. (in press). The National Writing Project’s Using Sources Tool: Practical Measures for Informing Instruction and Building a Shared Vision of Argument and Student Capacity. In P. G. LeMahieu & P. Cobb (Eds.), Practical Measurement for Improvement. Harvard Education Press.
Takahashi, S., & Norman, J. R. (in press). Practical Measurement for Improvement: Context of Use and Features. In P. G. LeMahieu & P. Cobb (Eds.), Practical Measurement for Improvement. Harvard Education Press.
Kazemi, E., Resnick, A. F., & Gibbons, L. K. (n.d.). Principal Instructional Leadership to Transform Elementary Mathematics School-Wide: Why Vision for Teacher Learning Matters.
Anderson, E., & Young, M. D. (2018). If They Knew Then What We Know Now, Why Haven’t Things Changed? An Examination of District Effectiveness Research. Frontiers in Education, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2018.00087
Bernardinelli, D., Rutt, S., Greany, T., & Higham, R. (2018). Multi-Academy Trusts: Do They Make a Difference to Pupil Outcomes? In UCL IOE Press: London, UK. [Report]. UCL IOE Press.
Daly, A., & Finnigan, K. (2016). Thinking and Acting Systemically: Improving School Districts Under Pressure. American Educational Research Association.
Duff, M., Flack, C., Lyle, A., Massell, D., & Wohlstetter, P. (2019). Managing Networks for School Improvement: Seven Lessons from the Field (CPRE Workbooks). https://repository.upenn.edu/cpre_workbooks/1
Frankenberg, E., Siegel-Hawley, G., & Diem, S. (2017). Segregation by District Boundary Line: The Fragmentation of Memphis Area Schools. Educational Researcher, 46(8), 449–463. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X17732752
Glazer, J. L., & Egan, C. (2018). The Ties That Bind: Building Civic Capacity for the Tennessee Achievement School District. American Educational Research Journal, 55(5), 928–964. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831218763088
Glazer, J., Massell, D., Lenhoff, S. W., Larbi-Cherif, A., Egan, C., Taylor, J., Ison, A., Deleveaux, J., & Millington, Z. (2020). District-led School Turnaround: Aiming for Ambitious and Equitable Instruction in Shelby County’s iZone (CPRE Research Reports). https://repository.upenn.edu/cpre_researchreports/114
Glazer, J. L., Massell, D., & Malone, M. (2019). Charter Schools in Turnaround: Competing Institutional Logics in the Tennessee Achievement School District. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 41(1), 5–33. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373718795051
Godfrey, D. (Ed.). (2020). School Peer Review for Educational Improvement and Accountability: Theory, Practice and Policy Implications. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48130-8
Greany, T. (2022). Place-Based Governance and Leadership in Decentralised School Systems: Evidence from England. Journal of Education Policy, 37(2), 247–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2020.1792554
Holmqvist, M. (2003). A Dynamic Model of Intra-and Interorganizational Learning. Organization Studies, 24(1), 95–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840603024001684
Honig, M. I. (2008). District Central Offices as Learning Organizations: How Sociocultural and Organizational Learning Theories Elaborate District Central Office Administrators’ Participation in Teaching and Learning Improvement Efforts. American Journal of Education, 114(4), 627–664. https://doi.org/10.1086/589317
Honig, M. I., Lorton, J. S., & Copland, M. A. (2009). Urban District Central Office Transformation for Teaching and Learning Improvement: Beyond a Zero-Sum Game. Teachers College Record, 111(13), 21–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810911101302
Leithwood, K., & Azah, V. N. (2017). Characteristics of High-Performing School Districts. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 16(1), 27–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2016.1197282
Leithwood, K., & Mccullough, C. (2017). Strong Districts and Their Leadership Project: Executive Summary of Research. Council of Ontario Directors of Education.
Lenhoff, S. W., Edwards, E. B., Claiborne, J., Singer, J., & French, K. R. (2022). A Collaborative Problem-Solving Approach to Improving District Attendance Policy. Educational Policy, 36(6), 1464–1506. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904820974402