2219 items

• Continuous Improvement in Education
  Peurach, D. J. (Ed.). (2021). Continuous Improvement in Education. Oxford Bibliographies. Oxford University Press. https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/page/155
• How Are Management Fashions Institutionalized? The Role of Institutional Work
  Perkmann, M., & Spicer, A. (2008). How Are Management Fashions Institutionalized? The Role of Institutional Work. Human Relations, 61(6), 811–844. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726708092406
• How School and District Leaders Access, Perceive, and Use Research
  Penuel, W. R., Briggs, D. C., Davidson, K. L., Herlihy, C., Sherer, D., Hill, H. C., Farrell, C., & Allen, A.-R. (2017). How School and District Leaders Access, Perceive, and Use Research. AERA Open, 3(2), 2332858417705370. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858417705370
• Enduring Dilemmas of School Organization
  Ogawa, R. T., Crowson, R. L., & Goldring, E. B. (1999). Enduring Dilemmas of School Organization. In J. Murphy & K. S. Louis (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Educational Administration (Second, pp. 277–295). Jossey-Bass, Inc.
• The Co-evolution of Technology, Industrial Structure, and Supporting Institutions
  Nelson, R. R. (1994). The Co-evolution of Technology, Industrial Structure, and Supporting Institutions. Industrial and Corporate Change, 3(1), 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/3.1.47
• Bringing Change into the Lives of the Poor: Entrepreneurship Outside Traditional Boundaries
  Martí, I., & Mair, J. (2009). Bringing Change into the Lives of the Poor: Entrepreneurship Outside Traditional Boundaries. In B. Leca, R. Suddaby, & T. B. Lawrence (Eds.), Institutional Work: Actors and Agency in Institutional Studies of Organizations (pp. 92–119). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511596605.004
• Institutional Entrepreneurship in Emerging Fields: HIV/AIDS Treatment Advocacy in Canada
  Maguire, S., Hardy, C., & Lawrence, T. B. (2004). Institutional Entrepreneurship in Emerging Fields: HIV/AIDS Treatment Advocacy in Canada. The Academy of Management Journal, 47(5), 657–679. https://doi.org/10.5465/20159610
• Institutional Work: Refocusing Institutional Studies of Organization
  Lawrence, T., Suddaby, R., & Leca, B. (2011). Institutional Work: Refocusing Institutional Studies of Organization. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20(1), 52–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492610387222
• Institutional Work: Actors and Agency in Institutional Studies of Organizations
  Lawrence, T. B., Suddaby, R., & Leca, B. (Eds.). (2009). Institutional Work: Actors and Agency in Institutional Studies of Organizations. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511596605
• Institutions and Institutional Work
  Lawrence, T. B., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutions and Institutional Work. In The SAGE Handbook of Organization Studies (2nd ed., pp. 215–254). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608030
• Institutional Work: Current Research, New Directions and Overlooked Issues
  Lawrence, T. B., Leca, B., & Zilber, T. B. (2013). Institutional Work: Current Research, New Directions and Overlooked Issues. Organization Studies, 34(8), 1023–1033. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840613495305
• Institutional Strategy
  Lawrence, T. B. (1999). Institutional Strategy. Journal of Management, 25(2), 161–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639902500203
• The Boundary Specification Problem in Network Analysis
  Laumann, E. O., Marsden, P. V., & Prensky, D. (1983). The Boundary Specification Problem in Network Analysis. In R. S. Burt & M. J. Minor (Eds.), Applied Network Analysis: A Methodological Introduction (pp. 18–34). SAGE.
• Institutional Pluralism Revisited
  Kraatz, M. S., & Block, E. S. (2017). Institutional Pluralism Revisited. In The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (pp. 532–557). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446280669.n21
• Collective Impact
  Kania, John, & Kramer, Mark. (2011). Collective Impact. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 9, 3641. https://doi.org/10.48558/5900-KN19
• The Strong Field Framework: a Guide and Toolkit for Funders and Nonprofits Committed to Large-scale Impact
  James Irvine Foundation. (2009). The Strong Field Framework: A Guide and Toolkit for Funders and Nonprofits Committed to Large-scale Impact. Bridgespan Group. https://irvine-dot-org.s3.amazonaws.com/documents/64/attachments/strongfieldframework.pdf?1412656138
• Field Building: Lessons From The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation’s Anthology Series
  Isaacs, S. L., & Knickman, J. R. (2005). Field Building: Lessons From The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation’s Anthology Series. Health Affairs, 24(4), 1161–1165. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.24.4.1161
• Fields, Institutional Infrastructure, and Governance
  Hinnings, C. R., Logue, D., & Zietsma, C. (2017). Fields, Institutional Infrastructure, and Governance. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, T. B. Lawrence, & R. E. Meyer (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (pp. 170–197). https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446280669.n7
• The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism
  Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Lawrence, T. B., & Meyer, R. E. (Eds.). (2017). The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. SAGE Publications. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781526415066
• Institutional Work: Taking Stock and Making It Matter
  Hampel, C. E., Lawrence, T. B., & Tracy, P. (2017). Institutional Work: Taking Stock and Making It Matter. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, T. B. Lawrence, & R. E. Meyer (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (pp. 558–590). https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446280669.n22
• Institutional Entrepreneurship in Mature Fields: The Big Five Accounting Firms
  Greenwood, R., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutional Entrepreneurship in Mature Fields: The Big Five Accounting Firms. The Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 27–48. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.20785498
• Looking Back to Accelerate Forward: Toward a Policy Paradigm That Advances Equity and Improvement
  Gonzales, D., & Vasudeva, A. (2021). Looking Back to Accelerate Forward: Toward a Policy Paradigm That Advances Equity and Improvement. In Aspen Institute. Aspen Institute. https://www.aspeninstitute.org/publications/looking-back-to-accelerate-forward/
• Institutional Entrepreneurship as Embedded Agency: An Introduction to the Special Issue
  Garud, R., Hardy, C., & Maguire, S. (2007). Institutional Entrepreneurship as Embedded Agency: An Introduction to the Special Issue. Organization Studies, 28(7), 957–969. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607078958
• Bringing Society Back In: Symbols, Practices, and Institutional Contradictions
  Friedland, R., & Alford, R. (1991). Bringing Society Back In: Symbols, Practices, and Institutional Contradictions. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. University of Chicago Press. https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/N/bo3684488.html
• A Theory of Fields
  Fligstein, N., & McAdam, D. (2015). A Theory of Fields. Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199859948.001.0001
• Social Skill and Institutional Theory
  Fligstein, N. (1997). Social Skill and Institutional Theory. American Behavioral Scientist, 40(4), 397–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764297040004003
• Social Network Analysis Methods in Educational Policy Research
  Fligstein, N. (1997). Social Skill and Institutional Theory. American Behavioral Scientist, 40(4), 397–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764297040004003
• Field Building for Population-Level Change
  Farnham, L., Nothmann, E., Tamaki, Z., & Daniels, C. (2020). Field Building for Population-Level Change. Bridgespan Group. https://www.bridgespan.org/insights/library/philanthropy/field-building-for-population-level-change
• The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields
  DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
• Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory
  DiMaggio, P. J. (1988). Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory. In L. G. Zucker (Ed.), Research on Institutional Patterns. Ballinger Publishing Co.
• Creating an Institute for Education Improvement
  Davis, A. C. (2021). Creating an Institute for Education Improvement. Bellweather Education Partners. https://bellwethereducation.org/sites/default/files/Bellwether_PandemictoProgress_CreateInstitute_Final.pdf
• Collective Impact Forum
  Collective Impact Forum. (2021). About us: From uncommon goals to common results. https://www.collectiveimpactforum.org/about-us
• Vice Presidential Address: Developments in Education Policy Research: Building a Scholarship of Improvement
  Cohen-Vogel, L. (2019, April). Vice Presidential Address: Developments in Education Policy Research: Building a Scholarship of Improvement. American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Toronto, ON.
• Support a Science of Performance Improvement
  Bryk, A. S. (2009). Support a Science of Performance Improvement. Phi Delta Kappan, 90(8), 597–600. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170909000815
• Powers of Theory: Capitalism, the State, and Democracy
  Alford, R. R., & Friedland, R. (1985). Powers of Theory: Capitalism, the State, and Democracy. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511598302
• Doing Critical Policy Analysis in Education Research: An Emerging Paradigm
  Young, M. D., & Diem, S. (2018). Doing Critical Policy Analysis in Education Research: An Emerging Paradigm. In C. R. Lochmiller (Ed.), Complementary Research Methods for Educational Leadership and Policy Studies (pp. 79–98). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93539-3_5
• Introduction: Critical Approaches to Education Policy Analysis
  Young, M. D., & Diem, S. (2017). Introduction: Critical Approaches to Education Policy Analysis. In M. D. Young & S. Diem (Eds.), Critical Approaches to Education Policy Analysis: Moving Beyond Tradition (pp. 1–13). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39643-9_1
• Whose Culture Has Capital? A Critical Race Theory Discussion of Community Cultural Wealth
  Yosso , T. J. (2005). Whose Culture Has Capital? A Critical Race Theory Discussion of Community Cultural Wealth. Race Ethnicity and Education, 8(1), 69–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/1361332052000341006
• Teaching and Learning About Complex Systems in K–12 Science Education: A Review of Empirical Studies 1995–2015
  Yoon, S. A., Goh, S.-E., & Park, M. (2018). Teaching and Learning About Complex Systems in K–12 Science Education: A Review of Empirical Studies 1995–2015. Review of Educational Research, 88(2), 285–325. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317746090
• Improvement Science as a Promising Alternative to Barriers in Improving STEM Teacher Quality through Professional Development
  Wright, K. B. (2019). Improvement Science as a Promising Alternative to Barriers in Improving STEM Teacher Quality through Professional Development. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 92(1–2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2018.1532953
• Evaluating PK–12 Professional Learning Communities: An Improvement Science Perspective
  Woodland, R. H. (2016). Evaluating PK–12 Professional Learning Communities: An Improvement Science Perspective. American Journal of Evaluation, 37(4), 505–521. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214016634203
• How Central Office Leaders Influence School Leaders’ Decision-Making: Unpacking Power Dynamics in Two School-Based Decision-Making Systems
  Wong, L.-S., Coburn, C. E., & Kamel, A. (2020). How Central Office Leaders Influence School Leaders’ Decision-Making: Unpacking Power Dynamics in Two School-Based Decision-Making Systems. Peabody Journal of Education, 95(4), 392–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2020.1800175
• The Imperative of Social Foundations to (Urban) Education Research and Practice
  Warren, C. A., & Venzant Chambers, T. T. (2020). The Imperative of Social Foundations to (Urban) Education Research and Practice. Educational Researcher, 49(5), 369–375. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20923289
• The Privatization of Education: A Political Economy of Global Education Reform
  Verger, A., Fontdevila, C., & Zancajo, A. (2016). The Privatization of Education: A Political Economy of Global Education Reform. Teachers College Press.
• Getting Better at Getting More Equitable: Opportunities and Barriers for Using Continuous Improvement to Advance Educational Equity
  Valdez, A., Takahashi, S., Krausen, K., Bowman, A., & Gurrola, E. (2020). Getting Better at Getting More Equitable: Opportunities and Barriers for Using Continuous Improvement to Advance Educational Equity (pp. 1–29). WestEd. https://www.wested.org/resources/getting-better-getting-more-equitable/
• Equity-Oriented Reform Amid Standards-Based Accountability: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of an Intermediary’s Instructional Practices
  Trujillo, T. M., & Woulfin, S. L. (2014). Equity-Oriented Reform Amid Standards-Based Accountability: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of an Intermediary’s Instructional Practices. American Educational Research Journal, 51(2), 253–293. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831214527335
• Democratic School Turnarounds: Pursuing Equity and Learning from Evidence
  Trujillo, T., & Renee, M. (2012). Democratic School Turnarounds: Pursuing Equity and Learning from Evidence. In National Education Policy Center. National Education Policy Center. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED536004
• The Modern Cult of Efficiency: Intermediary Organizations and the New Scientific Management
  Trujillo, T. (2014). The Modern Cult of Efficiency: Intermediary Organizations and the New Scientific Management. Educational Policy, 28(2), 207–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904813513148
• Toward a Practice-Based Theory for How Professional Learning Communities Engage in the Improvement of Tools and Practices for Scientific Modeling
  Thompson, J. J., Hagenah, S., McDonald, S., & Barchenger, C. (2019). Toward a Practice-Based Theory for How Professional Learning Communities Engage in the Improvement of Tools and Practices for Scientific Modeling. Science Education, 103(6), 1423–1455. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21547
• Discursive Burdens: Negotiating Difference in an Education Movement
  Taylor-Heine, M., & Wilson, T. S. (2022). Discursive Burdens: Negotiating Difference in an Education Movement. Journal of Education Policy, 37(3), 379–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2020.1829074