Items

• Design-Based Implementation Research: An Emerging Model for Transforming the Relationship of Research and Practice
  Fishman, B. J., Penuel, W. R., Allen, A.-R., Cheng, B. H., & Sabelli, N. (2013). Design-Based Implementation Research: An Emerging Model for Transforming the Relationship of Research and Practice. National Society for the Study of Education, 112(2), 136–156.
• Design-Based Implementation Research [Workshop]
  Penuel, W. R. (2015, July 8). Design-Based Implementation Research. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QV9K4mkKaxc
• Design Research with Educational Systems: Investigating and Supporting Improvements in the Quality of Mathematics Teaching and Learning at Scale
  Cobb, P., Jackson, K., Smith, T., Sorum, M., & Henrick, E. (2013). Design Research with Educational Systems: Investigating and Supporting Improvements in the Quality of Mathematics Teaching and Learning at Scale. Teachers College Record, 115(14), 320–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811311501408
• Design Experiments in Educational Research
  Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design Experiments in Educational Research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032001009
• Design Based Research Methods – Part II (EDC&I 582)
  Bang, M., & Bell, P. (2013). Design Based Research Methods – Part I [EDC&I 582 Syllabus]. University of Washington. https://education.uw.edu/sites/default/files/EDCI%20582%20Design%20Class%20Part%202%20Spring%202013%20Syllabus%20Final.pdf
• Design Based Research Methods – Part I (EDC&I 581)
  Bang, M., & Bell, P. (2013). Design Based Research Methods – Part I [EDC&I 581 Syllabus]. University of Washington. https://education.uw.edu/sites/default/files/Bang%20EDCI%20581%20Fall%202012_0.pdf
• Department of Education Organization Act of 1979
• Democratizing Educational Innovation and Improvement: The Policy Contexts of Improvement Research in Education
  Peurach, D. J., Foster, A. T., Lyle, A., & Seeber, E. (2021). Democratizing Educational Innovation and Improvement: The Policy Contexts of Improvement Research in Education. CPRE Working Papers. https://repository.upenn.edu/cpre_workingpapers/27
• Deliberative Democratic Theory and Empirical Political Science
  Thompson, D. F. (2008). Deliberative Democratic Theory and Empirical Political Science. Annual Review of Political Science, 11(1), 497–520. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.081306.070555
• Defining Collaborative Problem Solving Research: Common Values and Distinctive Approaches
  Penuel, W. R., Peurach, D. J., LeBoeuf, W. A., Riedy, R., Barber, M., Clark, T., & Gabriele, K. (2017). Defining Collaborative Problem Solving Research: Common Values and Distinctive Approaches. University of Colorado.
• Deep Changes in Classroom Practice: Teachers' Perspectives on the Effects of Participation in the C3WP
  Heenan, B., Houghton, N., Ramage, K., St. John, M., & Stokes, L. (2017). Deep Changes in Classroom Practice: Teachers’ Perspectives on the Effects of Participation in the C3WP. Inverness Research.
• Decolonization Is Not a Metaphor
  Tuck, E., & Yang, K. W. (2012). Decolonization Is Not a Metaphor. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 1(1), 1–40.
• Cultural Transposition of Chinese Lesson Study to Italy: An Exploratory Study on Fractions in a Fourth-Grade Classroom
  Bartolini Bussi, M. G., Bertolini, C., Ramploud, A., & Sun, X. (2017). Cultural Transposition of Chinese Lesson Study to Italy: An Exploratory Study on Fractions in a Fourth-Grade Classroom. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 6(4), 380–395. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-12-2016-0057
• Critical Race Praxis: Race Theory and Political Lawyering Practice in Post-Civil Rights America
  Yamamoto, E. (1997). Critical Race Praxis: Race Theory and Political Lawyering Practice in Post-Civil Rights America. Michigan Law Review, 95(4), 821–900.
• Critical Pedagogy and Sociocultural Theory
  Vossoughi, S., & Gutiérrez, K. D. (2016). Critical Pedagogy and Sociocultural Theory. In Power and Privilege in the Learning Sciences. Routledge.
• Creative Experience
  Follett, M. P. (1924). Creative Experience. Longmans, Green and Company.
• Creating Research-Practice Partnerships in Education
  Penuel, W. R., & Gallagher, D. J. (2017). Creating Research-Practice Partnerships in Education. Harvard Education Press. https://www.hepg.org/hep-home/books/creating-research-practice-partnerships-in-educati
• Creating a System for Data-Driven Decision-Making: Applying the Principal-Agent Framework
  Wohlstetter, P., Datnow, A., & Park, V. (2008). Creating a System for Data-Driven Decision-Making: Applying the Principal-Agent Framework. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 19(3), 239–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243450802246376
• Counter-Mapping the Neighborhood on Bicycles: Mobilizing Youth to Reimagine the City
  Taylor, K. H., & Hall, R. (2013). Counter-Mapping the Neighborhood on Bicycles: Mobilizing Youth to Reimagine the City. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 18(1), 65–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-013-9201-5
• Core Practices and Pedagogies of Teacher Education: A Call for a Common Language and Collective Activity
  McDonald, M., Kazemi, E., & Kavanagh, S. S. (2013). Core Practices and Pedagogies of Teacher Education: A Call for a Common Language and Collective Activity. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(5), 378–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487113493807
• Conversations with Our Faculty: June Ahn
  UCI School of Education. (2019, August 5). June Ahn Full Interview. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FC5a4KeBjfE
• Controlling Variation in Health Care: A Consultation from Walter Shewhart
  Berwick, D. M. (1991). Controlling Variation in Health Care: A Consultation from Walter Shewhart. Medical Care, 29(12), 1212–1225.
• Continuous Improvement of the Teaching Process in Primary Education
  Szőköl, I. (2017). Continuous Improvement of the Teaching Process in Primary Education. Journal of Language and Cultural Education, 6(1), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.2478/jolace-2018-0004
• Continuous Improvement in the Public School Context: Understanding How Educators Respond to Plan–Do–Study–Act Cycles
  Tichnor-Wagner, A., Wachen, J., Cannata, M., & Cohen-Vogel, L. (2017). Continuous Improvement in the Public School Context: Understanding How Educators Respond to Plan–Do–Study–Act Cycles. Journal of Educational Change, 18(4), 465–494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-017-9301-4
• Continuous Improvement in Practice
  Hough, H. J., Willis, J., Grunow, A., Krausen, K., Kwon, S., Mulfinger, L. S., & Park, S. (2017). Continuous Improvement in Practice (Policy Analysis for California Education). https://edpolicyinca.org/publications/continuous-improvement-practice
• Continuous Improvement in Education
  Park, S., Carver, P., Nordstrum, L., & Hironaka, S. (2013). Continuous Improvement in Education (p. 48) [White Paper]. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
• Continuity and Change: Chinese Lesson Study Redefined in the Context of Key Competencies-Based Reform
  Fang, Y., Paine, L., & Huang, R. (2022). Continuity and Change: Chinese Lesson Study Redefined in the Context of Key Competencies-Based Reform. International Journal for Lesson & Learning Studies, 11(2), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-04-2022-0057
• Contextual Design
  Beyer, H., & Holtzblatt, K. (1999). Contextual Design. Interactions, 6(1), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.1145/291224.291229
• Contemporary Issues in Educational Evaluation and Improvement (EDUC 737)
  Peurach, D. J. (n.d.). Professional Development Seminar in Education. University of Michigan School of Education. Retrieved August 20, 2022, from https://soe.umich.edu/academics-admissions/course-syllabi/educ-570
• Conduct a Lesson Study Cycle on Fractions [Lesson Study Group Course]
• Conceptualizing Research–Practice Partnerships as Joint Work at Boundaries
  Penuel, W. R., Allen, A.-R., Coburn, C. E., & Farrell, C. C. (2015). Conceptualizing Research–Practice Partnerships as Joint Work at Boundaries. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR), 20(1–2), 182–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/10824669.2014.988334
• Complex Systems View of Educational Policy Research
  Maroulis, S., Guimerà, R., Petry, H., Stringer, M. J., Gomez, L. M., Amaral, L. A. N., & Wilensky, U. (2010). Complex Systems View of Educational Policy Research. Science, 330(6000), 38–39. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1195153
• Communicating Effectively in an Improvement Network
  Roschelle, J., & Thorn, C. (2017). Communicating Effectively in an Improvement Network [Webinar]. https://includescenter.org/webinars/communicating-effectively-in-an-improvement-network/
• Common Core, Uncommon Theory of Action: CEOs in New York City Schools
  Wohlstetter, P., Buck, B., Houston, D. M., & Smith, C. O. (2016). Common Core, Uncommon Theory of Action: CEOs in New York City Schools. In A. J. Daly & K. S. Finnigan (Eds.), Thinking and Acting Systemically: Improving School Districts Under Pressure (pp. 147–182). American Educational Research Association. https://doi.org/10.3102/978-0-935302-46-2_6
• Cognitive Tutors: Lessons Learned
  Anderson, J. R., Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K. R., & Pelletier, Ray. (1995). Cognitive Tutors: Lessons Learned. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(2), 167–207. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0402_2
• Co-Designing for Privacy, Transparency, and Trust in K-12 Learning Analytics
  Ahn, J., Campos, F., Nguyen, H., Hays, M., & Morrison, J. (2021). Co-Designing for Privacy, Transparency, and Trust in K-12 Learning Analytics. LAK21: 11th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference, 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1145/3448139.3448145
• Co-design as Infrastructuring with Attention to Power: Building Collective Capacity for Equitable Teaching and Learning Through Design-Based Implementation Research
  Bakah, M. B. A., Nihuka, K. A., & Anto, A. G. (2019). Fostering the Sustainability of Curriculum Innovations Through Curriculum Design. In J. Pieters, J. Voogt, & N. Pareja Roblin (Eds.), Collaborative Curriculum Design for Sustainable Innovation and Teacher Learning. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20062-6
• Clear, Measurable Goals and Empathy Help Scale Improvement Science at High Tech High
  Baron, K. (2016, December 8). Clear, Measurable Goals and Empathy Help Scale Improvement Science at High Tech High. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. https://www.carnegiefoundation.org/blog/clear-measurable-goals-and-empathy-help-scale-improvement-science-at-high-tech-high/
• Circling To Move Ahead: Building Asian American Community Power For Educational Justice
  Okuno, E., Chen, J. C., & Huang, M. (2020). Circling To Move Ahead: Building Asian American Community Power For Educational Justice. https://familydesigncollab.org/2020/04/25/circling-to-move-ahead-building-asian-american-community-power-for-educational-justice/
• Chinese Lesson Study: Critical Aspects of Transfer From China to Italy
  Ramploud, A., Funghi, S., & Bartolini, M. G. (2022). Chinese Lesson Study: Critical Aspects of Transfer From China to Italy. International Journal for Lesson & Learning Studies, 11(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-04-2021-0031
• Chinese Lesson Study Reconceptualized in Time of Core Competencies-based (hexin suyang 核心素养) Reform [Special Issue]
  Fang, Y., Huang, R., & Chen, X. (Eds.). (2022). Chinese Lesson Study Reconceptualized in Time of Core Competencies-based (hexin suyang 核心素养) Reform [Special Issue]. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 11(2).
• Charter Schools in Turnaround: Competing Institutional Logics in the Tennessee Achievement School District
  Glazer, J. L., Massell, D., & Malone, M. (2019). Charter Schools in Turnaround: Competing Institutional Logics in the Tennessee Achievement School District. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 41(1), 5–33. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373718795051
• Charter Schools in Turnaround: Competing Institutional Logics in the Tennessee Achievement School District
  Glazer, J. L., Massell, D., & Malone, M. (2019). Charter Schools in Turnaround: Competing Institutional Logics in the Tennessee Achievement School District. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 41(1), 5–33. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373718795051
• Changing Concepts in Activity: Descriptive and Design Studies of Consequential Learning in Conceptual Practices
  Hall, R., & Jurow, A. S. (2015). Changing Concepts in Activity: Descriptive and Design Studies of Consequential Learning in Conceptual Practices. Educational Psychologist, 50(3), 173–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2015.1075403
• Carnegie Commons Blog: Improvement Approaches [Special Series]
  McKay, Sarah. (2017). Improvement Approaches [Special Series]. Carnegie Commons Blog. https://www.carnegiefoundation.org/blog/tag/Improvement_Approaches/
• Building the Infrastructure to Improve the Use and Usefulness of Research in Education
  Tseng, V., & Nutley, S. (2014). Building the Infrastructure to Improve the Use and Usefulness of Research in Education. In K. S. Finnigan & A. J. Daly (Eds.), Using Research Evidence in Education (pp. 163–175). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04690-7_11
• Building the Framework: A Report on Elementary Grades Reading in Tennessee
  Tennessee Department of Education. (2017). Building the Framework: A Report on Elementary Grades Reading in Tennessee. In Tennessee Department of Education. Tennessee Department of Education. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED590225
• Building School-Wide Capacity for Improvement: The Role of Leadership, School Organizational Conditions, and Teacher Factors
  Thoonen, E. E. J., Sleegers, P. J. C., Oort, F. J., & Peetsma, T. T. D. (2012). Building School-Wide Capacity for Improvement: The Role of Leadership, School Organizational Conditions, and Teacher Factors. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 23(4), 441–460. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2012.678867
• Building Networked Improvement Communities In Education
  Gomez, L. M. (2011). Building Networked Improvement Communities in Education. WGBH Forum Network. https://forum-network.org/lectures/building-networked-improvement-communities-education/
• Building Capacity Through Developing and Supporting New Curriculum Materials in a Research-Practice Partnership
  Penuel, W. R. (2017). Building Capacity Through Developing and Supporting New Curriculum Materials in a Research-Practice Partnership. STEM Education Seminar Series, Flagstaff, AZ. https://nau.edu/cstl-old/stem-seminars/