Skip to main content

Critical Issues and Common Pitfalls in Designing and Conducting Impact Studies in Education: Lessons Learned from the What Works Clearinghouse (Phase I)

Item

Title
Critical Issues and Common Pitfalls in Designing and Conducting Impact Studies in Education: Lessons Learned from the What Works Clearinghouse (Phase I)
Abstract/Description
Drawing on our five years of experience developing WWC evidence standards and reviewing studies against those standards as well as current literature on the design of impact studies, we highlight in this paper some of the most critical issues and common pitfalls in designing and conducting impact studies in education, and provide practical guidance on addressing these issues and avoiding common pitfalls. This paper serves as a quick reference guide for researchers who design and conduct impact studies in education and related fields. Information presented in this paper may also help research users make better informed judgments about the quality of the research and the credibility of the evidence produced from the research.
Author/creator
Date
2010
In publication
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis
Volume
32
Issue
3
Pages
351-371
Resource type
en
Medium
en Print
Background/context type
en Conceptual
Featured case/project
What Works Clearinghouse (WWC)
Open access/free-text available
en No
Peer reviewed
en Yes
Language
en
ISSN
0162-3737
Citation
Song, M., & Herman, R. (2010). Critical Issues and Common Pitfalls in Designing and Conducting Impact Studies in Education: Lessons Learned From the What Works Clearinghouse (Phase I). Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 32(3), 351–371. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373710373389
Abbreviation
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis

Export

Comments

No comment yet! Be the first to add one!

I agree with terms of use and I accept to free my contribution under the licence CC BY-SA.

New Tags

I agree with terms of use and I accept to free my contribution under the licence CC BY-SA.