Participatory Design Research as a Practice for Systemic Repair: Doing Hand-in-Hand Math Research with Families
Item
- Title
- Participatory Design Research as a Practice for Systemic Repair: Doing Hand-in-Hand Math Research with Families
- Abstract/Description
- Success and failure in formal mathematics education has been used to legitimize stratification. We describe participatory design research as a methodology for systemic repair. The analysis describes epistemic authority--exercising the right or the power to know--as a form of agency in processes of mathematical problem solving and learning. We asked: What will aid families in advocating for their children's math learning, particularly when they expressed concern about their ability to do so? Participatory design research provided a collaborative and iterative method to work with people who shape math learning: parents, children, teachers, community organizers, researchers, curriculum developers, and mathematicians. Data from four years of participant observation involved the design, facilitation, and dissemination of workshops and take-home materials and family case studies. As participating families claimed epistemic authority, institutional barriers became more visible. This tension maps where participatory design methodology can evolve to address systemic change.
- Date
- In publication
- Cognition and Instruction
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 222-235
- Resource type
- en Research/Scholarly Media
- Resource status/form
- en Published Text
- Scholarship genre
- en Methodological
- Open access/full-text available
- en Yes
- Peer reviewed
- en Yes
- URL
- Publisher Webpage
- Open Access Preprint (via UC San Diego eScholarship)
- Open Access PDF (via UC San Diego eScholarship)
- ERIC Webpage (#EJ1103147)
- Grant funding
- National Science Foundation (NSF)
- Grant number
- National Science Foundation (Grant #DRL0196211)
- Citation
- Booker, A., & Goldman, S. (2016). Participatory Design Research as a Practice for Systemic Repair: Doing Hand-in-Hand Math Research with Families. Cognition and Instruction, 34(3), 222–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2016.1179535
Annotations
There are no annotations for this resource.


